It's true that I am getting back to work. I've been in the studio everyday this week so far, making some progress on the slew of unfinished paintings in various stages that are stacked up in there. I'm also trying to get clear about my intentions with this new work as I need to give it a name soon. Even though my new work shares a strong association with still life, there is also something about it that relates to landscape. Today, I went to the library to look for any contemporary landscape painting and came back with three other hefty books, but I couldn't find anything on the topic for which I initially set out. One of the books is a catalog from a Eggleston retrospective, I love his photographs, but didn't like learning more about his personal life in the fairly recent documentary about him.
Recently, the paintings that I have been the most engaged with have been those that focus on things that my kids have made or the arrangements of things left behind after they are done playing. I've been wondering if I want to make that relationship between their creative process and my own the focus of the body of work. Today, I realized that it is actually more important to me, in thinking about this idea of the domestic landscape and what is 'left outside the frame', that I include less predictable and innocent subject matter in the series. I'm interested in presenting a full picture of domestic life, or what is behind the scenes. Though this is based on personal experience and started from 'found scenes' in my home, I am now considering pushing some of the images so that there is a question about what is fact and what is fiction--introducing some more ambiguity.